How to Eliminate Homelessness in the US

Not a quick fix, but one that affects the root cause. And what’s the root cause you may ask? A psychology, traditions and the values of an average US family. It’s a thing that is going to be hard to change, but perhaps some legislation may help. Here’s a suggestion (just an outline, let law makers flesh out the details) of a change, which I know most people in US will have hard time accepting, but unless they do, there will be dysfunctional families, lost young adults and homelessness:

  1. Parents (or whatever guardian) must remain responsible for food and shelter of their children until they (the children) are capable of supporting their basic needs by themselves, no matter how old are the children. Invest into your children and they will be off your support sooner.
  2. At the same time, while parents (guardians) support their children, they are the guardians and have the decision making rights for their children, regardless of their children age (adults or not, you’re an adult when you can support yourself).

Yes, I know, it’s considered a “good thing” to cast children out as soon as they turn 18 and let them fend for themselves, so that they would learn to be stronger and self-sufficient. In reality, immature kids can’t (or don’t want to) invest in their future, fall out from their parents’ influence into who knows whose influence, jump on “adult pleasures”, use drugs, may get involved in crimes, and, most importantly, when parents, all of a sudden, come to their senses and try to fix it, they have no rights to do anything, their child is adult and has the right to screw him or herself, and that’s what they are going to do, supported by the society and the legislation. And so, we let those kids with lack of any experience and underdeveloped brains to fall into the wild river that fills homeless community with newly baked drug addicts without means and lack of any skills to climb out of that hole.

I’m not fantasising, there are countries with strong family traditions, like the country I came from: Armenia. Despite the economic collapse in early 90-ies, a continuous war and recent large number of refugees and even orphans fleeing from Artsakh, there are almost no homeless people in Armenia. The families, or extended families pick up everybody and make sure they have food and shelter.

We say all the time that the family is the building block of a healthy society, yet we created a culture where family bonds are treated by contempt, and we foster lonely and selfish individuals who are easily influenced and manipulated – a breeding ground for psychopaths and criminals.

Life is sad

Life is a process of accumulating sorrows. Every year ads more, and by the time you’re 60 there are already many losses, and each one is uniquely unreplenishable. Of course, there is joy and happiness in life, but those are fleeting, while the losses stay with you forever. And even happy memories make you sad now, because each of them is just another loss.

Human Laws

Laws and regulations imposed on society are all evil. Some are necessary evil, most aren’t; those are pure life and freedom suffocating evil. They are usually created with good intentions, but, just like a bad medicine, instead of revoking them, we create new ones to deal with all the side effects and just end up with lots of poison and many more side effects.

Don’t speak: somebody may get offended.

It’s becoming exceedingly dangerous voicing your opinions in this country; punishment may range from losing your job to death threats and violence.

There is a big difference between helping people and pleasing them. How much are we willing to sacrifice trying to please those hypothetical over-sensitive people we don’t even know? The remaining shards of our basic freedoms? We already lost most of them to so-called “safety”. I couldn’t agree more with Benjamin Franklin who said: “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”

On lock-downs and safety

The best way to keep everybody safe is to put all people into solitary confinement cells. Forever. Because flu kills people too, and every life matters, right? And I’m not talking about all the other dangers in the outside world: car accidents, crime, etc. And, don’t worry, if you scare people enough, they will gladly and happily forget about all their freedoms and run into the cell. Now we know that.

Building from Code

Nature makes hardware the way we make software: it invented a code and lets the hardware build itself using that code. This makes making updates easy and quick. It achieved incredible sophistication with live organisms: every new organism is an upgrade with code updated with other parent’s code and some random (as it seems) mutations.

Our first, clumsy attempt to build hardware in a similar way, was the invention of 3D printing. Assembly line robots do not really build hardware but rather help with specific functions, in other words, at least for now, they cannot build anything notable from design blueprints. 3D printers can, though, technically, 3D printers are robots too.

Happiness

Happiness is a natural human condition, we all feel it when we stop worrying.

So, as ridiculously cliché as it sounds, the phrase: “Don’t worry, be happy” has a bit of beautiful wisdom in it, though, of course, what I’m saying is not a prescription, but an observation. True: most of our worries are irrational and counterproductive, but some are useful, like those that force us to take actions preventing even worse worries down the line. Fixing a roof that is about to leak comes to mind… So, yeah, go ahead fix that roof of yours and you may feel a bit happier, albeit with less money in your pockets.

Disclaimer: I’m not fixing roofs, and I’m not associated with anybody (as far as I know) who may profit from your maintenance projects. Here, I said it, one less thing to worry about.

Social Security

This is a development of the original idea suggested by my friend Greg Shirakyan (who has since moved on to building Photographer Robots) on a fair and self-sufficient system of social security, and it gives investing in one’s children a whole new meaning. I have thought of many details of this system that would make it more acceptable for more egalitarian part of the society, but describing it here would take too much space; so, here’s the gist of it:

A certain percentage of person’s income goes to his/her parents’ retirement fund (I have some ideas on how to deal with divorced/widowed parents, more than two parents participating in child’s bringing up, etc.). If a person doesn’t have parents, her/his contributions go to the social security fund from which all retired people get their benefits, just like it is today, but in significantly reduced amounts. Childless people will have to rely on that minimal payment, which I consider fair as they invested less in their children and had the opportunity to save more into their retirement accounts, their own careers, etc. Same goes for the parents whose neglectful upbringing resulted in children who do not generate enough income to provide significant additional funds for their parents’ retirement. Children who care more about their parents (as a direct result of parents caring about their children) may make additional tax-exempt contributions. A part of the fund can go to an insurance fund for parents who lost their children to death or work-impairing disability.